Talk:Description

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Untrue sentences

"The following two sentences are untrue. The word description can be used interchangeably with the word theory in physics. When an observer is said to describe an event, experiment, or observation, this is a direct reference, which means a theory describes the event, experiment, or observation." A quite peculiar form of expressing one's disagreement, I'd say. --Oop (talk) 03:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These statements have now been removed.—Anita5192 (talk) 04:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bertie

Since Bertie Russell's 'classical texts' are mentioned they should get proper references. 31.52.255.231 (talk) 11:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the Philosophy section carefully, you will see that Bertrand Russell's classical texts are already linked as the nature of description. That article has the references you seek.—Anita5192 (talk) 15:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]