Talk:Derventio Coritanorum

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Derbyshire High‑importance

The article on Derventio Coritanorum is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article

Derby Museum and Art Gallery Mid‑importance

	This article is related to the Derby Museum and Art Gallery. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Derby Museum and Art GalleryWikipedia:GLAM/DerbyTemplate:WikiProject Derby Museum and Art GalleryDerby Museum and Art Gallery-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Roman & Byzantine / Classical Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dates

Seems to me that the sited "founded" and "abandonded" estimates are related to The Strutt's Park Fort across the river, not to Derventio. --Tappinen (talk) 10:18, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.--ClemRutter (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's true. But what are we to say instead? The fort was apparently used 80-120 AD (according to our text) but the settlement as a whole seems to have been occupied much longer. So what do we put in the infobox?

What does it mean, in the infobox, to say that Derventio was "part of" Icknield Street? Was Icknield Street a line of defence? Andrew Dalby 13:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

Where does the name "Derventio Coritanorum" come from? Is it derived from the Coritani?

Since the 1980s, the generally-academically-accepted reconstruction of the name of the civitas has been "Corieltauvorum"^[1]. Markaeologist (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Corieltauvi

Which civitas?

The map accompanying the Corieltauvi entry ^[1] has this part of Derbyshire as being Corieltauvi territory. The map for the Cornovii ^[2] has the Cornovi territory avoiding Derbyshire altogether. Is there any evidence that the current text saying 'This part of Britannia was occupied by a tribe known as the Cornovii' is correct? Markaeologist (talk) 21:35, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Derventio Coritanorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Derventio Coritanorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to change names and claim that Derby was in Cornovii territory

Quite simply the fort at Derby cannot both be "Derventio Coritanorum" (Derventio of the Coritani) and simultaneously be in the territory of the Cornovi. So I think the claim that Derby was in Cornovi territory should be changed to something like 'it is not certain to what civitas Derventio belonged, but the Cornovi and Corieltavvi seem the most likely candidates'.

Secondly, Derby was never "Derventio Coritanorum" anyway, because this is an official form of address implying it's a civitas capital. If that's the case, I think there needs to be something about it, but then again, I've never heard such a thing, so I don't think it ever was the capital.

Third, "Coritanorum" has not been the reconstructed form of the civitas name since the 1980s. Not that it matters because it shouldn't appear in this article anyway, not being part of Derby's name, but if Derby is in the territory of the Corieltavvi, we should probably try and spell it properly.

Unless evidence to contradict the general thrust here is presented, I propose to change the article in line with the above.

Markaeologist (talk) 11:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Derventio Coritanorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/67fV4BS4O?url=http://www.le.ac.uk/ulas/publications/documents/21derrom_000.pdf to http://www.le.ac.uk/ulas/publications/documents/21derrom_000.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strange Sentence

I removed this: "The Roman all had different this's in like and they always wanted to change.", which seems meaningless. Cunningpal (talk) 01:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Corieltauvi

[2] ttps://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Corieltauvi

[3] ttps://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Cornovii_(Midlands)

[1]

[1]

[2]