Jump to content

Talk:Der 100. Psalm/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 15:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. MWright96 (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

History

[edit]
  • "beginning on 24 April 1908 and working on it until the beginning of July that year." - worked
good catch, was kindly changed already --GA
  • "Part I was first performed on 31 July 1908 for the university anniversary." - university's anniversary
same --GA
  • Reger received an honorary doctorate from the Jena University. - honourary doctorate
done --GA
  • Remove the second wikilink of Leipzig
done --GA

Structure and scoring

[edit]
  • "A short instrumental introduction, marked Andante sostenuto," - I think either marked by or marked in is more accurate
Sorry, but I have not seen that in six years of writing on classical compositions. --GA

Jauchzet

[edit]
  • "The treatment of the line has been regarded as an "orchestral explosion"," - regarded by whom? Also the comma should be a period.
I will think about dropping it, because it may hold up the flow too much to explain. --GA
I tried now to say who, could add a date and location if wanted. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think that would be unncessary. MWright96 (talk) 06:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "marked sostenuto and pp." - same point as in the Structure and scoring section
same answer --GA
  • "marked espressivo und crescendo." - and
another good catch, thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erkennet

[edit]
  • "with a solo violin picturing the "sheep of his pasture"." - needs a citation
will look, but don't immediately recall where I read that --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
found it --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gehet zu seinen Toren ein

[edit]
  • "The key of F-sharp minor and a triple meter are intruduced by the orchestra." - typo
found it fixed already --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denn der Herr ist freundlich

[edit]
  • "The climactic ending has been regarded as a "gloriously polychromatic form"." - regarded by whom?
same as above --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:13, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Versions

[edit]
  • "François Callebout wrote an organ version that was published in 2004 in by Dr. J. Butz." - remove the second instance of the word "in"
done --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Good work so far. On hold until the points have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for good reading. I was happily away singing the piece. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. Promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 06:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]