Talk:Depends What You Mean by Extremist
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
See also
[edit](making a new section to avoid edit warring)
Hi @Grayfell: You commented: "The obvious, and false, implication with this link is that Islam is extremist. Better no link than garbage like that." Such an implication may be 'obvious' to you, but not to anyone else. The reason I gave for including it was a valid one, and your personal reaction, I'm sorry to say, does not negate it. And you've once again failed to account for why you removed the link to Anarchism in Australia. Cheers. --Ya hemos pasao (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- There is no obvious connection between Islam in Australia and Extremism which isn't charged and inflammatory. See also sections do not provide any room for context, so this is not an appropriate place to 'hitn at' charged topics. It doesn't have to be "obvious" to you, it is ambiguous enough to be totally inappropriate. Grayfell (talk) 08:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Those are some interesting buzzwords but, again, your subjective POV of how it might be perceived is not a good enough reason not to include a pertinent link. And this is the third time you've failed to account for why you removed the Anarchism link. --Ya hemos pasao (talk) 09:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)