Talk:Deogarh Fort

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Madhya Pradesh / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

On 9 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Deogarh Fort, Madhya Pradesh to Deogarh Fort. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 9 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 21:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deogarh Fort, Madhya Pradesh → Deogarh Fort – unnecessary disambiguation MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support agreed with nominator's argument Uttarpradeshi (talk) 10:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support unambiguous I didn't notice the page was created a few hours ago, and is now contested for copyright violations. If after the copyright violations are removed and no content exists, the page could be deleted. — DaxServer (talk to me) 11:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Contested deletion

Resolved

– Copyright issue resolved; revision deletion requested. --Stylez995 (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (I am correcting it, please wait for 48 hours, i will correct it by using reliable information from different independent sources) --Uttarpradeshi (talk) 10:24, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do it as soon as possible, then request revision delete using {{Copyvio-revdel}} template. If I don't see the issue has been revolved within 48 hours, then I'll need to nominate for speedy deletion again. --Stylez995 (talk) 11:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stylez995 done, i have edited this article to the best of my knowledge and ability, please check and feel free to vote for the page move, if you want. Uttarpradeshi (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved Thanks for resolving the issue. I've requested revision deletion of older revision containing copyright violations. --Stylez995 (talk) 17:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]