Talk:Dental implant/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a lot more work.

Many of the paragraphs and bulletpoint are lacking WP:ICs from WP:RSs.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Done 59 references and all are secondary or tertiary (mostly tertiary)[reply]
I see at least one instance where a URL is piped as a form of citation (diagram).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Done removed the piped diagram, reference #15 is guidance from the FDA on testing of dental implants. I don't believe it's published except as a web reference - I believe I've cited it correctly but please let me know if it needs changing. Ian Furst (talk) 01:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The wikification is off with bolding of words used extensively without reason.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Done Ian Furst (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The page lacks flow given the widespread gallery use. It would be better if the images appeared alongside the corresponding text. Use Template:Multiple image if multiple images need to be near certain text.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done changed over to T:MI and several pics removed that added little to explainations Ian Furst (talk) 02:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are the {{main}} templates at the bottom of sections?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC) all removed Done Ian Furst (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please spend some time with WP:WIAGA and WP:MOS. Then consider revising this article and resubmitting. For now, I am failing this aritcle.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC) thank you for the review; will work a lot harder on it Ian Furst (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have been asked to reassess this article. It is still failing for lack of WP:ICs from WP:RS in many paragraphs. In a well structured article each paragraph presents a new topic and each should have at least one inline citation. I will not be passing this article. You can renominate it when the editorial work has been completed. Alternatively, you can appeal for a WP:GAR discussion of the version of the article that I failed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC) DoneThanks tony - at that time was just looking for feedback on the changes to pics - I've now gone thru the entire article for WP:RS in each paragraph - all are secondary or tertiary (many list as PMID's but are Cochrane reviews, systematic reviews). thank you for the feedback.Ian Furst (talk) 02:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]