Jump to content

Talk:Denise Schmandt-Besserat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives

Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 21:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Subject's Home Page

[edit]

This article (posted substantially as it still is by rmeyermn in August 2006, is virtually an exact copy of Dr. Schmandt-Besserat's home page at the University of Texas. See this.Brett epic 17:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The site is also credited "Website Design by Rifkind © rmeyermn@yahoo.com". My main concern is the image, but it may well be within User:Rmeyermn's power to release it into PD. I shall let others challenge its presence on Wikipedia. -- Yamara 06:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Denise Schmandt-Besserat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Denise Schmandt-Besserat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is this article balanced?

[edit]

The criticism section, the longest section of the article, strongly implies that Schmandt-Besserat has taken credit unfairly, ignores the work of others, or makes exaggerated claims as to her contribution. It may be that the media coverage of this subject (the origins of language, the use of the tokens and bullae) may have exaggerated Schmandt-Besserat's contribution to make a good magazine article or TV doc, and in the process ignored important work done by others. If that's the case we should say so, and not blame her for grabbing the limelight and being a glory hound. As it stands now, I find the article to be somewhat lopsided. At the very least I'll add a few sentences about her work, her methods and how they may have been different from what had come before. Sam Perkins (talk) 19:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having begun reading the scholarly challenges to DSB's findings, it's clear that she made claims that have been questioned, and in some cases strongly rebutted. Untangling her real contributions from her more questionable assertions and hypotheses will take some work. Sam Perkins (talk) 19:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]