This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Denise R. Osborn is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This is good work for a first article! Notable subject for an article and no major problems. I've added some standard things to finish off an article on an academic: I've added a "default sort" tag, so she appears in categories indexed under surname not first name, an "authority control" tag linking to her work on library categories, and a few categories. Important is the "living people" category, as articles on living people often need more scrutiny to prevent vandalism. And put in a reference list and set it to display in columns, and a tag on the talk page for what type of article this is. Few formatting things: it's customary to put references after a full stop, with no space (someone wrote a bot that automatically fixes this, though). While I can tell you put a lot of work into it, in my view it's rarely worth doing a bibliography for an academic who publishes frequently, they're so often out of date the day after they're added and just mirror whatever website the information came from when the page was written. (Though it's maybe more useful in the case of an academic who's retired and doesn't have a faculty site where they can list what they think their most important work is, as here.).
Great article with accurate information. The academic paper list will need to be updated frequently as this author publishes regularly. Marlism (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]