Talk:Demonizing the enemy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Demonizing the enemy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

non-reliable source

This, which is pretty much what the definition is based on, is most likely not a reliable source, given the publisher. Volunteer Marek 06:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Book written by Jules Boykoff is used as source for carefully attributed assertion what Jules Boykoff thinks. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 07:00, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's AK press, a fairly fringy publisher (though I like their Murray Bookchin stuff). So yes, the book is a source for what Jules Boykoff thinks, but why should we have an article about what Jules Boykoff thinks? Because that's pretty much what this article is. It's not a notable/reliable source. Volunteer Marek 07:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply is WP:IDHT case. A book written by Jules Boykoff is used as source for carefully attributed assertion what Jules Boykoff thinks. If you can not present any evidence that the publisher misinterpreted Boykoff's opinion please present it here. Otherwise, please drop the stick. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, YDUI. The point is that the whole article is based on this idea of Boykoff's, which he published in a book which is neither notable, nor does it even satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for notability. "Attributing" something is not an escape clause from WP:NOTABLE, WP:RS or WP:OR. Nor is it supposed to be a way to sneak around (WP:GAME) Wikipedia's policies on WP:FRINGE. Volunteer Marek 08:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a feeling that you are going to tag bomb this article too. If you really think this article is based on idea of Boykoff's, please be so kind to put your money where your mouth is and initiate AfD of this article. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:24, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking about it. Looking at the sources in more depth first. Volunteer Marek 18:27, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with demonization

Should be merged with Demonization which already has a section on political demonising. Crawiki (talk) 13:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am opposed to your merge proposal. The article on demonization refers to "...any characterization of individuals, groups, or political bodies as evil". This article is about the propaganda technique used against targeted enemy.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]