This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Christiaanp, care to discuss your reversion since you decided not to leave an edit summary? All of the changes made by DeMimovingdg7, as far as I can tell, were either updating current sources and information or included new sourced information but all is attributable and referenced. Can you provide a reasoned explanation for why you oppose these additions? --ARoseWolf18:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Christiaanp, that's not a valid reason to keep something from being included, especially sourced information. There are lots of things I don't like but if it meets Wikipedia criteria for inclusion then we can't remove it without a valid reason.--ARoseWolf19:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Christiaanp, I don't like some things either, but that is not a good opinion. I only revert vandalism, not really reverting good edits unless if they were reverts that have no edit summary. Wesoree (Chat with me!) 21:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]