Jump to content

Talk:Delaware Route 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDelaware Route 10 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 3, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 10/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Canadian Paul (talk · contribs) 20:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since Wikipedia is so slow, I'd prefer to do a shorter article for review today, and this one fits the bill. Hopefully I will get to it later tonight. Canadian Paul 20:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Well, I performed some minor copyedits, but otherwise this article seems to satisfy the GA criteria, a rare pass without a hold for me, so congratulations and thank you for all your work! Canadian Paul 00:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]