Talk:Delafloxacin

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Delafloxacin.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

cats

We need to link this to the Fluoroquinolones category box. JamesLockson (talk) 16:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phase III trial - when

Did one start in 2012 or will this in 2013 be the first Ligand Partner Rib-X Initiates Phase 3 Trial of Captisol-enabled™ Delafloxacin IV ? - Rod57 (talk) 10:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Someone should update that info. --47.19.185.138 (talk) 20:08, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical Trials

I would like to add information about Delafloxacin's clincal trials. I was wondering how to cite this so as to not get removed. I'm very new to writing on wikipedia, but was wondering why the government clinical trials site was found "unsourced". Thanks for your help. Caleb.akers (talk) 19:06, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia content is preferentially based on secondary sources. If all you want to do, is say that trials happened in the past, any secondary source per WP:RS is fine (this is just history). If you want to describe results of those trials, WP:MEDRS sources are needed. Ongoing trials are generally not OK per WP:NOTNEWS. Jytdog (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]