Talk:Dehlavieh (missile)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dehlavieh (missile) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Merge proposal

Please use this space to discuss the proposed merge of Dehlavieh (missile) and Pirooz (anti-tank guided missile). Pinging @Ominae:, who initiated the proposal. Joyous! Noise! 02:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge, the articles have too much overlap and are essentially on the same subject. Streamline8988 (talk) 04:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: one discusses the rocket, which would be launched from a variety of vehicles, and the other discusses one particular launch vehicle. Hence, these are different topics, with readers best served by having them separately discussed. This follows the structure of other articles, too, like the Russian missile 9M133 Kornet being separate from the carrier Kornet-D. Klbrain (talk) 15:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, with no merge, given the uncontested objection with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 11:49, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]