This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The Criticism section is currently the largest section of this article. Wikipedia frowns on Criticism sections. It has been suggested in discussions about criticism sections that editors should attempt to move criticisms to the sections that they may apply to throughout the article. My criticisms have been moved (twice) from another section to a Criticism section and I'd like some feedback from our editors. Gandydancer (talk) 20:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did not intend to circumvent Wikipedia editorial policy. But there seem to be stand-alone "Criticisms" sections all over Wiki, including Facebook#Criticisms_and_controversies, which was what first came to mind. If consensus is towards greater integration, then by all means...
Criticism sections are generally frowned upon. See WP:CRITICISM for an explanation. There are indeed a lot of articles with criticism sections--not because they're good, but because they're easy to write. If Wikipedia were a finished project, which of course it's not, then most or all criticism sections would be phased out and integrated into the rest of their articles. There is no reason to have a criticism section in this article. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
