Talk:Deepwater stingray/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Okay - I will make any straightforward changes as I go, and note queries below. Please revert if I inadevertently change the meaning. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is found widely in the Indo-Pacific - just sounds odd to me, I'd go with "It is widely distributed in the Indo-Pacific" or "It has a wide range across the Indo-Pacific"
- Changed.
- It is found widely in the Indo-Pacific - just sounds odd to me, I'd go with "It is widely distributed in the Indo-Pacific" or "It has a wide range across the Indo-Pacific"
- (902–2,230 ft) - I'd round to 900 ft here. Consistent with the other measurements being 0 or 5 aliquots.
- Rounding fixed.
- (902–2,230 ft) - I'd round to 900 ft here. Consistent with the other measurements being 0 or 5 aliquots.
- Any information on its placement intiialy in the genus Urotrygon?
- Added a bit more detail.
- Any information on its placement intiialy in the genus Urotrygon?
Otherwise, looking nice and tight prose- and comprehensivenesswise. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 00:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- nice compact, succinct article on a little-known species. I guess it'd be a bonus to get an idea of what "small numbers" mean WRT catching off Africa and more on taxonomic status and biology as information becomes available and accessible. Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. So many species left to be studied...I worry that a lot will go extinct before we learn much about them. -- Yzx (talk) 01:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)