Talk:Deepwater Horizon litigation

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Syndicate 1036 at Lloyd's

Do they insure BP at all? [1] Kittybrewster ☎ 10:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New charges: BP oil spill judge approves $7.8B partial settlement of claims

To add to the investigations: $7.8B partial settlement of claims, and another source for this and other recent charges, from NY Newsday petrarchan47 t c 22:42, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of unsourced claims

Leaving these here until a source can be found:

"The shareholders are suing BP for They are suing BP under Texas law for statutory fraud and for common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation."

"Previously, a Texas district court ruled that BP’s overseas shareholders would be allowed to use both Texas common law and UK common law in claims against BP." petrarchan47 t c 03:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Deepwater Horizon litigation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]