Talk:Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

"National Commission for Men" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National Commission for Men. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 14:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Men's commission

I am yet to find any sources which criticised her role in support of Men's commission. I just read the sources and I there have been no mention of subject's name in any article or book. There have been criticisms of such 'ideas' but she is neither criticised nor Men's commission is her born baby. In this case, I have not find any details about subject or rebuttal of her ideas or campaigning. These all details should be just moved to the page of National Commission for Men. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 05:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see why we need to fetch sources, that specifically criticize her roles in MRA. We are not writing a summary-style biographical outline; and that we are allowed to tackle her views, mentioning the mainstream scholarship on those issues is warranted per WP:ACHIEVE NPOV. ∯WBG^converse 10:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winged Blades of Godric, I am still asking for the sources in which mainstream scholarship have condemned her support. My point is as simple as that. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 11:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I can see that the paragraph you added namely critics note that, doesn't criticise her views and I miserably failed to search her name in the source. I am pinging @Nizil Shah: and @Ms Sarah Welch: for their opinion on the matter. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 11:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's a strawman query.

For example, our article about Gary Null notes that:- ... Null has been also a supporter of touch therapy and magnet therapy - both of which have been long determined to not provide any tangible health benefits.[35][36][37][38][39][40][41]... Most of the citations have nothing to do with Garry, but rather provides support for the second part of the sentence.

It's irrational to expect mainstream scholarship to mention every fringe-activist by name while debunking their bunkum. ∯WBG^converse 12:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with WBG. There is no article on Men's commission. So criticism of Commission or such idea of her should be included here IMO.-Nizil (talk) 12:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]