Talk:Deep state

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deep state article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Military history Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Additional information:
/
	No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the main project talk page.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lebanon's Hezbollah.

I don't think they are really a state within a state. They are too public. Officially a political party. The electoral system in Lebanon encourages organizations like Hezballah. They are really a so called Non State Actor.

"Deep state in Russia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Deep state in Russia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 26 § Deep state in Russia until a consensus is reached. ^Queen of _Hearts 06:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Layout over-emphasises recent US usage

By including discussion of recent US usage of the term in the early passages of this article, I’m concerned we may be inadvertently strengthening the association of the “deep state” with the Trump administration.

I don’t dispute that Trump’s appropriation of the concept is noteworthy, to be clear: he invoked it all the time, and (AFAIK) the phrase was not used in US political discourse before he introduced it.

Neither do I mean to invoke Template:Globalize, because the article as a whole uses examples from all over the world.

For the reasons described above, I think it’s best to ask other editors a few questions before making significant changes:

Is Trump’s usage of the term given excessive prominence in the current article?
If yes, how can we remedy this?
Is this the only issue to be remedied, or should we consider major changes to the article as a whole?

Foxmilder (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)

The article wrongly depicted the RSS as a Deep State organization by the opposition Congress Party supporters. 106.222.218.238 (talk) 17:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]