Talk:Declaration of Helsinki

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finland Mid‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scope

This needs bringing into a project, such as medical ethics and research, along with related topics such as human experimentation, IRBs etc. --Mgoodyear 21:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved references to US practice to a new stub 'Common rule' since it was outside the scope of this page--Mgoodyear 21:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Format

I undid the last edit, it did not make sense in the overall format, probably better to discuss here--Mgoodyear 14:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undid edit because Additional Principles is a section heading within the Declaration, and should not have the same emphasis as bold titles - eventually these may get titles once the final structure is clear. --Mgoodyear 22:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If they're not sections, they don't need titles; Wikipedia is dynamic, not static, you ether must revert the article back to the last readable version, and work on a complete re-write offline or on your userpage, or ensure that the current revision is readable to users. If additional principles is not worthy of a section head, it shouldn't have the words 'additional principles' above it. --Honeymane_{Heghlu meH QaQ jajvam} 04:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was perfectly readable, your edits distorted the structure. Additional Principles governs Articles 28-32, and is emphasised because all of the controversy relates to this part of the Declaration. It covers three paragraphs within the Revision. Unfortunately some of the lesser Wiki section titles don't work very well. For instance a title should never have a smaller font size and the underlying test. Section titles have now been added. --Mgoodyear 23:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

I removed this reference as incomplete and unhelpful. I can't recall Adil Shamoo ever referring to this, and a scan of his most important papers on the subject fails to reveal it. Besides which something in press in 1993 should be published by 2007, and it is not in any literature search of this topic.

Shamoo, Adil E. and Irving, Dianne N. "Accountability in Research." 1993 in press - Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research, Boston, Oct. 21 - 22, 1993

--Mgoodyear 14:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete sentence needing clarification

It is said of the Helsinki Declaration "It is not a legally binding instrument in international,..."

In international law...or? The thought needs completion, but I'd hate to do it on a hunch. Dadofsam (talk) 21:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Human and Fluss (2001, p. 2) quoting Deutsch and Taupits says "…though [the Declaration] is not a legally binding instrument under international law [its] influence on medical ethics and national regulations on biomedical research cannot be overstated" so the wiki should say something like "it is not a legally binding instrument in international law". Bioethica (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

This article has been subject to extensive vandalism, with complete sections blanked out, not all of which picked up - it is going to take a lot of work to restore it. Particularly the work of User talk: 193.63.235.73 one of the notorious vandal from Robert Gordon University. So far I have found History, Fifth Revision, Second to Fourth revision, Background and all external links and references removed and replaced by "rubbish" Mgoodyear (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Declaration of Helsinki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luizpuodzius

Querendo traduzir é só dá o toque. att 187.20.19.45 (talk) 23:18, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]