Jump to content

Talk:Decentralised system

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content Ideas

[edit]
[edit]

Could relate this to distributed systems, while noting that a key difference is that distributed systems may still rely on centralised control.

It should be possible RealityDysfunction (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RealityDysfunction (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A comment on the picture representing de-centralized systems

[edit]

I agree on the relation with distributed systems and add that the picture used to represent de-centralized control in the main page does not depict its very definition. In fact de-centralized control refers to a system were the reaching of a global target is achieved by a multitude of peer nodes, acting following their own rules or possibly interacting with each other, but without coordination by a special (central) node. It seems to me that this has nothing to do with the connection topology of the nodes. The picture shows a star topology and a more general tree topology, both of which with a root node, which I find strongly misleading. In my opinion, the idea of de-centralized control is better represented by a set of nodes disconnected from each other. 193.106.183.2 (talk) 12:48, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ecosystems

[edit]

Would an ecosystem be a reasonable example of a naturally occurring decentralised system?

RealityDysfunction (talk) 20:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]