This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This is one of several pages I have put up for deletion. All of these pages are by the same author (account now deleted), about professors from the same university. While I will assume good faith that it is not the school self-promoting, the fact remains that the only sources for notability on these articles are the professor's own publications and their personal pages on the university's website, which does not meet WP:NOTE. Therefore, I have proposed them for deletion, pending any genuine sources on their notability existing.2601:405:4400:9420:D086:AC36:FF13:3352 (talk) 23:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how Nails is considered notable. This article should be deleted, as receiving awards, participating in fellowships, and teaching at a higher education institution does not mark a living person as notable. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 00:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Receiving awards and academic recognition from major universities does go toward notability, and would belong in a biographical article in any case; but a better indication of notability would come from her publications, and whether they are widely read or cited by scholars. Did you attempt to determine whether this is the case before proposing the article for deletion, or are you simply going by the current state of sourcing in the article? Generally articles should be deleted when the claims made (including to satisfy notability guidelines) are not verifiable, but verifiability depends on the availability of reliable sources, not on whether they are presently cited in the article. A good faith effort should be made to determine whether appropriate sources to demonstrate notability exist. If they do, then the subject is notable, even if the current text of the article and its sources are insufficient to show it. P Aculeius (talk) 13:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On pages 24 and 31 of Essays on Plato's Philosophy (2001), Professor Nails is cited and her conclusions as to scholarly effort to establish a chronology of Plato's works are discussed—the gist of it being that while broad categories of "early", "middle", and "late" works appears valid, more precise dating based on Plato's style is probably not justified due to his tendency to revise his works at a later period.
In Who is Phaedrus (2012), Nails' opinion that Plato's work indicates that Phaedrus was involved in the Profanation of the Eleusinian Mysteries, but not the Mutilation of the Herms, is contrasted with the opinions of the scholarly majority and the author's own conclusion.
In Crito, a Character Study (2019), Nails is cited for the assertion that Plato offers nothing to support the common portrayal of Socrates' wife, Xanthippe, as a brutal, foul-tempered woman—a portrayal perhaps dependent on unflattering comments by Antisthenes and Lamprocles—and in some respects appears to contradict the common portrayal.
Now, my expertise is insufficient to tell me how important these works are, academically-speaking, or whether some of Nails' other contributions are equally or more significant. But my first impression is that these citations establish a presumption of notability as a scholar on Plato—a presumption that would have to be rebutted by showing that they are really quite minor or unimportant. And if the subject of the article is notable, then some biographical details, including education, academic posts held, professional recognition, etc. would be expected, as long as its importance is not exaggerated. I also note that Professor Nails has been quoted several times in recent news articles relating to other matters—a scandal involving another member of the university's faculty—although how important or relevant to her biography this is should probably be discussed. P Aculeius (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NO! ~ Even just Debra Nails' biographical and historical work on Plato and his times qualifies her as notable. Prosopography is *standard reference* in Plato scholarship, both to students and scholars. Anyone who takes the trouble can discovers this by searching for reviews and for the steady stream of current citations of her books and articles. Please do so before proposing anything. BlueMist (talk) 01:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}