This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This section that follows all needs to be marked as from the publisher's description of the book on Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/Experimental-Knowledge-Science-Conceptual-Foundations/dp/0226511987). This is still plagiarism: "On page 4 of the first chapter, Mayo points out that "learning from error itself is fraught with too much risk of error" [2]. Mayo argues that we still haven't even started to learn enough about experimental knowledge. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge gives a critique of the subjective Bayesian probability of statistical inference; proposing Mayo's own error-statistical approach as a framework.
Mayo reports the needs of researchers who work with statistical analysis. Through this, she engages the philosophical problems of rationality. Learning from error, is another point that she argues; as well as detecting logical conflicts. She gives her complete program for how we learn about the world. Amazon gives the description of the her work by saying, "Her tough, practical approach will be important to philosophers historians, and sociologists of science, and will be welcomed by researchers in the physical, biological, and social sciences whose work depends upon statistical analysis."[3]"
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Cincinnati/Philosophy and Women (Summer 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
Done This has been done. The copyvio text has been removed entirely from the article.--FeralOink (talk) 05:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)