Jump to content

Talk:debbie tucker green

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Article title is wrong

[edit]

It was at "debbie tucker green" (no caps whatsoever). I tried moving it to the correct "Debbie Tucker Green" . The system incorrectly changed this to "Debbie tucker green". Proper nouns, such as names, are correctly capitalised on English. That an individual incorrectly spells their own name doesn't change this, although should be referenced in the article. Can someone help? Equinox 14:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Debbie tucker green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good sources

[edit]

-Kenirwin/(talk) 03:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant publicity

[edit]

This is not an encyclopaedia article.

It is absent basic information: when / where born, parents, education, personal life, etc., etc,. etc.

It simply consists of a cv-type, self-publicising list.

Such articles shouldn't even make the first hurdle without tangible content suited to an encyclopaedia. That is, if Wikipedia has aspirations to be an actual encyclopaedia. 86.153.162.1 (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]