The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This page was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Prior information was completely politically biased as demonstratively seen by citing the actual laws that did and did NOT apply to her care after the abortion pill caused her to bleed. She was entitled to care because she had already aborted the fetus by use of an abortion pill. It may be that her care was delayed or denied by ignorance on the part of medical providers sought when she was bleeding. But the actual law did NOT oppose the care she needed in order to save her from the bleeding caused by the drug(s) she took. 75.174.44.225 (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please add this section. It gives a more balanced POV. Without it, the article is inflammatory and may cause some to unnecessarily react and act in an emotionally driven way because the piece only provides a half story. Articles on Wikipedia should be presenting information, not propaganda. Mr Benny-Sanders (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is precisely the current state of the article. Why revert the edit to its original state? By definition the current article is one-sided because it supports the view that she died as a result of state laws. The referenced publication is itself one sided. By erasing the reference to the publication which had a completely different POV, you are erasing any pretense of neutrality. 75.174.44.225 (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
