Jump to content

Talk:Death in Bloom/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hmlarson (talk · contribs) 03:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC) Hello, I have begun the review and will be posting feedback below. As issues are addressed, please add a note indicating your changes to the relevant item listed below. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 02:48, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

Overall, this is a well-written article that meets all of the criteria for a Good Article. I made a few minor copy edits summarized below.

Lead

[edit]

Plot

[edit]

Production

[edit]

Review checklist

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    A well-written article. I had a few suggested copy edits listed above that I ended up making myself.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    n/a
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: