Talk:Death Wish (2018 film)

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Canadian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal / Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I need some help here...

Can someone help me fix this page? One source says Annapurna Pictures is still distributing the film in the United States. 98.235.48.206 (talk) 02:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source saying Annapurna is STILL a distributor for this film.

One source for this film says Annapurna Pictures is still distributing it. Wikia contributor 100.0.6.143 (talk) keeps removing the source! Can someone tell him that Annapurna is still distributing this film? On the other hand, do NOT remove Annapurna from this page. It if is removed, I'll keep re-adding it to the page. Seriously. This time, I believe in reliable sources! End of story. 98.235.48.206 (talk) 02:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Audience reception and controversy of the timing of movie's release in the lede part

Maybe we should find a way to put the audience reception of that movie on the lede part and keep the controversy of the timing of the film's release of that article without resorting to edit war. BattleshipMan (talk) 00:36, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There’s nothing to go off of as far as Audience response except CinemaScore, and that is only a B+ (hardly “high praise”). Very few film pages include audience reactions in the lede and unless we can get some PostTrak figures I don’t think just one publication is enough to make it worth noting up top. As far as the timing of its release that was mentioned in most reviews, and even the RT consensus, so definitely feel that has the weight to be included. TropicAces (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. This movie is notable - because of the difference between the critical consensus and the audience consensus - maybe we could average the two and say that this movie had average to poor reception overall. This is also notable because this film has such a split between the audience/critical consensus. 69.196.66.171 (talk) 21:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]