Talk:Dearborn–Putnam controversy

A fact from Dearborn–Putnam controversy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Dearborn-Putnam controversy erupted when Henry Dearborn accused Israel Putnam (both pictured) of cowardice 43 years after the Battle of Bunker Hill?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dearborn-Putnam controversy.

Wikipedia

Military history: Historiography / Early Modern / American Revolution

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Article

Suggestions welcomed. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphen in title

I believe the title should use a endash instead of a hyphen. MOS states "When naming an article, do not use a hyphen (-) as a substitute for an en dash that properly belongs in the title".[1] – Gilliam (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crowded

I'm not smart enought to tell you what, exactly, but trust me, there are a couple of things wrong with this sentence : " His accusations resulted in a political and social controversy that was widely covered in the press, with several publications from officers present at the battle, and whose prominence lasted more than 30 years." Interesting article, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gimelgort (talk • contribs) 06:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do to improve it. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]