Talk:Dead by Daylight/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AdrianGamer (talk · contribs) 15:04, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

I am sorry but this is a quick fail.

• Lead is too short. It does not summarize the article.
• Most content from the gameplay section is unsourced. It not well-written as well, with some parts directly addressing the reader as "you". The gameplay section should be written in a more concise way as well.
• The plot and the setting section seems to have plenty of original research as well, since you did not provide any reliable source to support them.
• No information about the game's development and release, which is unacceptable. You should look for developer interviews and game previews when you create a development section.
• The reception section is unsubstantial and poorly written with lots of one-sentence paragraphs.
• DLC information is poorly presented.

GA Criteria per WP:WIAGA
1	Well-written
1a	the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
1b	it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2	Verifiable with no original research
2a	it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
2b	reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
2c	it contains no original research
2d	it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3	Broad in its coverage
3a	it addresses the main aspects of the topic
3b	it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4	Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5	Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6	Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
6a	media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
6b	media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Cmt	There are a lot of problems with the article. I advise that you should look at WP:VG/GA to look at some of the project's quality articles as your references and you should familiarize yourself with the GA criteria as well. AdrianGamer (talk) 15:04, 10 May 2018 (UTC)