This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Useful article. There's one thing that could use clarifying (at least I continued to be confused by this). In classical studies, one finds citations such as Auct. Vir. Ill. 28, or Auctor, De viris illustribus, with a section number. Once upon a time, I figured this out, and now can't find it. Nor do I see it in the "authors and works" abbreviation table in the OLD, which is where I thought it must've been. Is this perhaps a more cautious assignment of anonymous authorship to a De viris that is sometimes ascribed to Aurelius Victor? That one seems to be section-numbered in the same way, maybe (judging from the citation here). Cynwolfe (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
