Talk:David Yermack

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

I have restored material about where he has been a visiting professor, and the editorial board of journals he has been on. Though they individually do not prove notability, they certainly contribute to it, and it is appropriate material for articles on faculty, and is always added if known.

As for notability, a full professor of finance at NYU's business school is almost certain to be notable. His publications needto be added , to show him as being an authority in his profession, according to WP:PROF. DGG (talk) 04:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

numbers of papers

I used the number "over 17" because I did what I know to be an incomplete search and found 17. They can of course be added, but I'd rather do that after a more complete search. Anyone else is welcome to do it of course. DGG (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My problem with this formulation is that it is unwarranted promotion for this person. We are not supposed to be writing a resume for him. The test for whether to include the number of publications should be whether any independent source has taken note of it. Does that seem reasonable? 160.39.213.97 (talk) 13:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No response from anyone? Does anyone have an objection to removing the number-of-papers data as promotional/CV-like? 160.39.213.97 (talk) 00:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - No one? Going once...going twice... 160.39.213.97 (talk) 07:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

of course I still object. It's normal content. DGG (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- I"m sorry, "normal content" is a circular and barely coherent argument. Anyone else? 160.39.213.97 (talk) 12:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:YermackNYU.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:YermackNYU.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Yermack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090405040117/http://globalfinance.bm.ust.hk:80/index.asp to http://globalfinance.bm.ust.hk/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]