Talk:David Woodard

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music

Composers

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have not committed Vandalism, when I have not deleted, changed or reverted anything in the article or in the talk page. I posted that the information that I have posted many times has been deleted, as a statement of fact. When I post this statement of fact about the article, my posting is again deleted over and over. Clearly someone wants to suppress what I am trying to say. I dare to comment that information which is vital and informative was then deleted. My question is whom is desperate to suppress the talk page? The Talk page is the proper place for talk about the article. The person needs to explain why my Talk entry is deleted instead of just deleting it. There needs to be a dialogue. Placid777 (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2001:62A:4:42F:E9EB:E4DE:D0C1:45BA|2001:62A:4:42F:E9EB:E4DE:D0C1:45BA

Sufficiently evocative description is indistiguishable from parody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:62A:4:42F:E9EB:E4DE:D0C1:45BA (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The most important reference links are being removed from the article unfairly

References and links have been removed for this Article by editor Bradrapt who called me out on the articles’ history page. I made four edits adding references for reliable and established media sources. Bradrapt clearly prefers less reliable, obscure, harder to validate sources, and non English sources. The last reference Bradrapt added was an obscure book which misspelled Woodard as Woodward. The almost incoherent text of the book (saved on Google Books) linked Woodard and the Dreamachine to Hitler. I was trying to add simple English Language source articles that are easy to access with a mere click. I saved each article on Archive Today. The only one of my edits that Bradrapt did not revert was a blog source called the “Book of Joe”. I also added archived references to Woodard’s Original Website about the Dreamachine found on the Wayback Machine in responsive to another editor’s assertion that not much about Woodard and the Dreamachine could be found online. These archived references were also removed. The established publications I used were The Orange County Weekly, The LA Times, and Vice Magazine. I believe there is a scheme to confuse the reader, by removing the easy to read references. Since these three references are not likely to be restored, I suggest readers independently search for these articles. I can not see the point in adding these references back only to have him delete them again. I will not engage in an online war, but I am defending my honor against the notices Bradrapt has placed in the article’s history, which can not be deleted.Ty78ejui (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Past Archived Discussions Created

I am posting a link to past discussions on the Talk Page because they have been unfairly removed and sent a page without any link created to people can find them; although no new discussions have been posted in the Talk Section. The only reason to have an Archive of Talk is when there is too much information and older discussions need to remove for the sake of saving space. The person who did it is a bad faith actor or a sock puppet. These sock puppets have also filled the page with poor references that can not be verified as being real. This has made this article unreliable, but I don't have time to sort it all out by removing these bad references and replacing them with verifiable references. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:David_Woodard/Archive_1 Ty78ejui (talk) 18:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Too Positive??

This article seems to glance right over the pretty significant concerns around Woodard’s actions around Neo-Nazism. Neiva Germania was founded by anti-Semites specifically to “seed the Aryan race”. He has an extensive past of skirting what is ethically acceptable in the name of curiosity and a distaste for “modern Western culture” and I think the public is done a mass disservice by hiding these elements in this article 2601:C0:C101:240:8DF0:C99B:792B:F602 (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]