Talk:David Urie

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Biography

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aerospace biography project.

It is requested that an image or photograph of David Urie be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Source for Information

The information in this article was originally from a press release put out by Rocketplane Limited, Inc., in 2005. I will need to dig hard to find the press release after so many years, and may not be able to find it. -- Joseph Huwaldt (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added some verifiable references I dug up on-line. -- Joseph Huwaldt (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

mach or march

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can someone in the know determine of there is a misspelling in mach/march "Urie was also Program Manager of the Trans Atmospheric Vehicle (TAV) at Lockheed. His team built and successfully tested a large-scale cross section Mach 25 structure."Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 09:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would it be March? The sentence wouldn't make any sense. The quote is referring to the McDonnell-Douglas TAV, which was a project to create a spaceplane that was designed to reach the velocity required for low earth orbit, which is approximately Mach 25. See Mach number. Thus the prototype Urie worked on was a "Mach 25 structure". ChiZeroOne (talk) 15:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. "Mach" is correct. JohnCD (talk) 15:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is why the question was phrased as "Can someone in the know" since we all are not the same and what you read is buffered by what you know and what I read is just met with a question. Have you ever done a search on "Mach" and seen how many relate to a date rather than a process? It will be difficult for you to find date-related Mach misspellings as I have corrected many of those that I have managed to find.Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 21:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]