Talk:David Seaborg

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 January 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

This consists mostly of unsourced paeans to the subject, and was most likely written *by* the subject or someone close to him. I don't think this person is worthy of an article; were he not the son of a Nobel laureate, he would not have one. If the article is to be kept, lines about his excellent public speaking skills and inspiring of young people (all unsourced, natch) should be stricken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.175.183 (talk) 04:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Barr0069 (article contribs).

Notability

I have looked at the two AfD discussions in 2006. I have also searched for additional coverage of Seaborg. I don't think notability is demonstrated in the article as it now is. There are not enough secondary sources, and too much focus on his father. Tacyarg (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]