Talk:David Peters (paleoartist)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Claims

The claims section should absolutely be included, there is no more reliable source on Peters' notoriously controversial claims than Peters himself. Wolfemoods (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:BLPSPS, particularly criterion 1: it is not unduly self-serving. Peters has spouted so many claims over the years that there's no way that they could all be reasonably be included. Users deciding based on their owns whims which of his claims are the most notorious or infamous is an act of WP:OR. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New reconstructions

Most of his reconstructions are bad, but his verions of Coelurosauravus, Ubirajara, Yi qi, and Ambopteryx make sense. I am a Green Bee (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]