Jump to content

Talk:David Pannick, Baron Pannick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

David Pannick QC won for Mr. Thompson, the high-profile case.

--Florentino floro (talk) 06:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latest high profile cases

[edit]

I added these 3 links to show his latest high profile cases handled: *timesonline.co.uk, Judges will carry on holding ministers to account - because that’s their job*guardian.co.uk, Unmarried sisters lose inheritance tax fight*thelawyer.com, Northern Rock showdown: It's Grabiner vs Beloff and Pannick --Florentino floro (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He is the counsel of Gary McKinnonscmagazineuk.com, NASA hacker appeals to House of Lords to overturn extradition--Florentino floro (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Pannick, Baron Pannick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1992 Maastrict case?

[edit]

It was mentioned in the House of Commons today (2019-03-27) that Lord Pannick represented Rees Mogg in 1992 in arguing that the government could not ratify the Maastrict treaty -- is this notable enough for inclusion? Source: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/1993/4.html ; see Hansard for reference. 2A00:23C0:FA11:F100:255F:442F:F950:E2F5 (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Prorogation case

[edit]

Pannick has been representing the case in court - outcome currently awaited - that Boris Johnson's government acted illegally in proroguing parliament for an unusually long period, allegedly to ensure that the UK leave the European Union without a deal by preventing parliament from stopping this from happening.

--peter_english (talk) 14:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]