Jump to content

Talk:David Kemp (politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Virtual Communities

[edit]

I added the following piece of text to the Virtual community page:

  • "non-local community" coined by Australian politician David Alistair Kemp in 1978[1] began the modern era of thinking about community as being liberated from frontiers.

Another American has removed it to puff the accomplishments of Barry Wellman as the originator of this line of thought, when David Kemp was talking about non-local community well before him. Does anyone think my edit should be restored so David Kemp is properly recognized as the person that first coined the term "non-local community"? --VCHunter (talk) 11:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Kemp, D.A. (1978). Society and Electoral Behaviour in Australia: A Study of Three Decades. University of Queensland Press. ISBN 0702210862

File:David Kemp.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:David Kemp.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why David Kemp did not make a direct transition from Shadow Cabinet to Cabinet

[edit]

I am writing this in regards to the piece in the article on why Kemp was not immediately promoted to Cabinet at the 1996 election which has been removed a couple of times by Cmr08.

Before I go on I am not convinced that Cmr08 has great knowledge about Australian politics and I find it suspicious that he made an edit on that piece of the article after he had responded to a question I posted at the Conservative Party of Canada article. To put it simply I think he has been following me around on Wikipedia by having a look at my contribution history and that I am pretty sure is stalking and I want him to stop.

What I said about Kemp not being promoted to Cabinet after the 1996 election make sense. He was a member of the Shadow Cabinet but then became a junior minister when the Coalition won government. The explanation of his assessment of his performance in Opposition seems very plausible.

From Cmr08: ‘ we can't just add info like this and tell other editors to source it” Then what is the point of having the “citation needed” statement. Information should only be removed if one knows for sure that it is untrue. As I do not think that Cmr08 has great knowledge of Australian politics he therefore does not know the information about Kemp to be untrue. Therefore there is no justification for its removal. 220.239.167.151 (talk) 03:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is the responsibility of an editor adding material to provide a source. Please provide a source per WP:BLP. Tassedethe (talk) 04:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The IP editor is right, I don't have a great knowledge of Australian politics, in fact I know very little and also don't know if the info is true or untrue. What I do know, is that the statement is unsourced, and falls under the living person policy, therefore there is justification for its removal.Cmr08 (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cmr08 has proven what has been said about him and curious that he did not deny the stalking allegation.58.109.94.172 (talk) 23:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You still can't add uncited POV to the article, sorry. Frickeg (talk) 23:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Kemp (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]