Talk:David Keene

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

David Keene has attracted more attention than he was bargaining for. Check out [1].YusufMJH (talk) 23:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Yorker article

The New Yorker had an article on gun control which is to a significant degree a profile of Keene.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/04/23/120423fa_fact_lepore Battleground America: One nation, under the gun. by Jill Lepore April 23, 2012 --Nbauman (talk) 01:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Claims about Keene's son

The Violence Policy Center is a gun control group, and as such is not a reliable or neutral source for this claim at all. The same goes for "Mother Jones." See WP:BLP and WP:NPOV. ROG5728 (talk) 23:37, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The information was confirmed on the conservative leaning CNSnews. There can be no credible claim the facts are not reliable because of a lack of "neutrality." http://cnsnews.com/news/article/conservative-leaders-son-jailed-road-rage-case — Preceding unsigned comment added by Underhillbill (talk • contribs) 21:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information is not relevant to the public figure this page is about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.251.65 (talk) 14:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information on public figures pages must pertain to the public figure the page is about.

How is this not relevant? If it wasn't relevent it wouldn't have been published in dozens of major newspapers. Further, plenty of Wiki pages include far far more personal information than this about relatives and most of that is far less relevant about their lives than this.

"Beware of claims that rely on guilt by association, and biased or malicious content." Also: "Many Wikipedia articles contain material on people who are not well known, even if they are notable enough for their own article. In such cases, exercise restraint and include only material relevant to the person's notability" See WP:BLP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.178.49.25 (talk) 16:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In light of the past few months, the rather convenient removal of the note on the criminal record of his son, who is serving 10yrs in a Virginian prison for road rage and firing a weapon at person in a car appears to be politically motivated. Here is a reliable source if a source is needed [2]. I would also suggest mentioning his ex-wife, Diana Hubbard Carr, who was convicted for mail fraud. Even in light of what has occurred in the United States over the past months with mass shootings, the involvement of the National Rifle Association and the ongoing debate on guns in American society, David Keene is a major U.S. public figure and information such as the gun crime of his son and embezzlement of his ex-wife must be stated and known or this page fails to uphold the values and spirit of Wikipedia. Thetallmanintheforest (talk) 20:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The actions of others are not relevant to his notoriety as a public figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.73.26.220 (talk) 05:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Both his wife and son worked for the ACU at the.time of their crimes, while he was Chairman. It's relevant. 184.78.81.245 (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are not. Including them is purely an attempt at guilt-by-association, which is absolutely forbidden per WP:BLP and any number of other content policies. There is no such thing as "corruption of blood" in the United States of America. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:24, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interview with Wolf Blitzer on January 16, 2013

During the interview Mr. Keene stated, "semi-automatic firearms have been around for a couple of hundred years", which is factually untrue. Semi automatic firearms were invented in the 1880's, becoming commonplace with law-enforcement during the 1920's.

This addition violates WP:OR (see WP:SYNTH) as well as WP:NPOV. ROG5728 (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David Keene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120426035254/http://www.constitutionproject.org/news/2007/12052007n.php to http://www.constitutionproject.org/news/2007/12052007n.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Keene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130728042316/http://spectator.org/archives/2004/06/03/oversee-the-patriot-act to http://spectator.org/archives/2004/06/03/oversee-the-patriot-act

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re; the price of freedom

I have just watched the documentary 'the price of freedom' .., I feel compelled to say, sir, you are living in the dark. People die by massive numbers by yours and NRA rhetoric..not only have you pervaded your country with thoughtless speech, you have passed a torch to those around you . I personally wish u well ,but,..vehemently disagree with what you stand for. When you meet Charlton Heston, I'm hoping the world will be a gentler place. Why this diatribe ? Ask the working class folks who can't afford the scraps of your dinner and look at the stats. You, sir, should be ashamed of your life. The ammendments stand for the people, not for your personal gain at the loss of life. 205.234.52.132 (talk) 08:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]