Jump to content

Talk:David Goodwillie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Charge

[edit]

His rape charge has now been dropped due to lack of evidence [1]. I think the section relating to this rape charge should be removed? Monkeymanman (talk) 16:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. doomgaze (talk) 18:30, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here is her opinion: [2]. PatGallacher (talk) 10:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. All that has happened is that the Procurator Fiscal has decided there is not enough evidence to convince a jury to convict. Fine that he's now legally in the clear, but air-brushing the entire episode from history strikes me as hagiography. Has anyone heard from the complainant in the case? What is her opinion, I wonder? --Oscar Bravo (talk) 11:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing as there has been no mention of who or what the complainant is (in any way) then ....Monkeymanman (talk) 14:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
there is a debate ongoing at Wikipedia:BLPN any comments should be directed there. At the moment there is more consensus for it to be included than not be but that may change. Warburton1368 (talk) 16:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a paragraph per that apparent consensus. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why has this been removed? It was and is certainly a controversy; the charged were dropped because of "insufficient evidence in law", which is different from charged being dropped by the accuser. At any rate, it was certainly news and is relevant to the biography of Goodwillie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.46.6 (talk) 12:09, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from D146895x, 1 August 2011

[edit]

In the 'Controversy' section: In January 2011, Goodwillie was charged with rape and released on bail. Ref: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12209157

D146895x (talk) 08:13, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been debated at WP:BLP it was decided that it would be included but in context of how his career has been on hold rather than to list under controversies.Warburton1368 (talk) 08:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Goodwillie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Goodwillie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on David Goodwillie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on David Goodwillie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rapist

[edit]

David Goodwillie is far more famous as a rapist than as a footballer. Should his status as a rapist be prominent in the first sentence of the article?

Htrowsle (talk) 22:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. His legal travails have been reported as widely as they have precisely because he was (to an extent still is) a prominent footballer. The civil trial for rape would have got some publicity because it was a legal novelty in Scotland, but calling him something other than a footballer would be placing the cart before the horse. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 10:35, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should we include him in the category "Scottish rapists"? PatGallacher (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, per the description of Category: Rapists: 'This category consists of individuals who have been convicted of rape in a court of law'. His case is equivalent to that of OJ Simpson - acquitted of murder at trial, found liable in the civil case - and he (rightly) isn't in Category:American murderers. Robofish (talk) 21:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"found to have raped"

[edit]

"In a civil case in 2016, he was found to have raped her and ordered to pay £100,000 in compensation."

That's overstating the situation. Better to say,

In a civil case in 2016, he was found more likely than not to have raped her and ordered to pay £100,000 in compensation. 93.19.21.160 (talk) 11:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's a clear finding. There's no place for mealy-mouthed qualifications of the matter. For criminal cases, are we thus to add the qualification "found beyond reasonable doubt to have"? A finding is a finding. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:David_Goodwillie&oldid=1199240775"