Talk:David Ewart

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I can't find any references to the Baddeck Armoury. Does/did this exist? Tchaliburton (talk) 04:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Black Watch Armoury

I've removed Black Watch Armoury from Ewart's list. I can't find a ref that designates him as architect whereas Parks Canada page for the armoury clearly states that it was designed by Finley and Spence. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

This article has two charts in it, both of which create problems.

First of all, the second chart (currently called "Alphabetical listing") refers to the CRHP (Canada's Historic Places) and to the DFHD by its older names (Directory of federal historic designations) as being historic designations. They are not. They are merely online databases. So the chart is both incorrect and misleading. The actual historic designations need to be inserted in the chart (although the CRHP and DFHD can be used as the sources in the citations). See WP:WHATISCRHP for more information.

Second, what is the difference between the charts? I can't tell. It's extremely confusing. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]