Talk:David Berkeley

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Berkeley article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[David Berkeley#Cardboard Boat|Cardboard Boat]]
[[David Berkeley#Oh Quiet World|Oh Quiet World]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Common Rotation

I saw David playing in the UK. CR played a handful of songs first, then DB came on and played a full set with CR joining him for two songs. If you ask me, they supported him.

I suppose they alternated - in Glasgow David played a short set and CR played a long one after him. I'll update the article with a half-way expression. McMarcoP (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Why is there so much 'criticism' of the artist? I'm not too familiar with him, but he is neither a politician or fringe scientist, making the inclusion of this section bizzare, especially given how much space it takes up proportional to the article as a whole. Honestly reads like someone with a personal vendetta is filling David's article with unecessary negative information. I suggest removing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.223.101 (talk) 22:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I added it and I am a huge fan (and a friend of David's as well), I just thought that some should be mentioned for the sake of completeness. Please be aware that most of it - as specified in the section - is hinted to in generically positive reviews. I will re-edit that section anyway. McMarcoP (talk) 08:54, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I removed the section and integrated the information there included in the rest of the article. McMarcoP (talk) 09:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from making an unnecessarily desperate case for Berkeley's inclusion in Wikipedia, this tellingly named "critical appreciation" section is an obvious exercise in cherry-picking and fails to preserve NPOV. That critics have favorably compared him to better known musicians seems to me an objective statement of fact, but balancing all the thumbs-ups and thumbs-downs is a hopelessly subjective exercise and seems inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. 69.217.194.205 (talk) 06:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, dear anonymous user, I tried to mention ALL the opinions given about David Berkeley by the various critics that I could find and source, and the positive reviews are many more than the negative ones. Every artist will fatally attract some negative comments, I guess it is one of the main risks of the profession, and for objectivity's sake I did report those I could find. The "Cleveland" reference might be little more than a curiosity, but I consider the observation about his ironic attitude between songs during his live shows quite relevant. Personally, I like his style - but the quoted article criticises it and I'd insist in keeping such observation in there. I like David Berkeley, but refusing to mention that some people might not appreciate this or that aspect of his style would be, in my opinion, exactly what you mention - a failure to preserve NPOV. McMarcoP (talk) 08:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment request

I will leave this at C-Class for now, because per the B-Class criteria it's not there yet, especially regarding a proper lead section that summarizes the article. Any editor can feel free to relist the article once this is addressed. Hekerui (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time! McMarcoP (talk) 12:23, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]