Jump to content

Talk:Daud Shah Bahmani/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Noorullah21 (talk · contribs) 22:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 18:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this soon. IntentionallyDense (talk) 18:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. see comments below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. See comments below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). See comments below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2c. it contains no original research. Per above. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. See comments below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). I feel like there is some unnecessary detail here but I haven't quite decided yet. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind strike that the detail is fine. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. See comments below. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
7. Overall assessment. I'm unfortunately going to have to fail this nomination due to 2 of the sources not being verified, the prose issues, and the NPOV issue. I think this article needs quite a bit of work and significant rewording before it can meet GA status. I hope this does not discourage you from continuing to improve this article. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's exactly what it means. Nobles that were present submitted homage to him. Noorullah (talk) 07:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]