Talk:DataGravity

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computer Security: Computing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

comments

Hello, @Animalparty: and @Jack Frost:I have seen the banners added to the page, I wrote yesterday on the Talk Page of the editor that placed the first banner, but I still have not received a response, so I copy it here, and I added in the article the new references I found:

And:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/geristengel/2014/04/23/growing-companies-big-isnt-just-for-the-boys/#39366e1779a6 - DataGravity only mentioned -.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/data-storytelling-offers-a-new-approach-to-storage-says-datagravity-founders/ - replacing Businesswire -

The company was mentioned as a section within the article of its founder, and I thought it was better to separate it. It is possible for you to rename the article?, in fact it is DataGravity Inc.

I also edited the article to be more neutral. It is not clear to me if I can remove the banners or if I should wait for your ok. Thanks!--BelleBenny (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BelleBenny: the new sources give better indication of notability. The Businesswire ref is a press release, the award is minor, and the CrunchBase directory listing indicates existence, not notability, but I think there is sufficient coverage from enough third-party sources to remove the Notability tag. I'm glad the mission statement was removed: these are almost never needed, and usuually sound promotional (see WP:MISSION). One last thing: you use a 2002 primary source by Jim Gray to verify the statement that the company was named after Gray's idea. It doesn't. We need an additional source that explicitly connects the two, otherwise this is original research. We as editors cannot infer or make educated guesses, even if it's likely to be true. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 04:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Animalparty:Thanks for your comments, I understand perfectly. I will look for a source for the mention of Jim Gray, if I do not find it I will delete the sentence. Another editor participated, adding information and replacing promotional information that I had deleted, I also went back to edit it, check it if you can. Thanks!--BelleBenny (talk) 07:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I have noticed that you have changed the name of the article, thank you very much! but could you incorporate the term INC at the end? since Data Gravity is also a concept about the performance of data access, and maybe it can be confused with the company.--BelleBenny (talk) 03:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BelleBenny: Per WP:COMMONNAME, article titles are generally the most commonly used name of a company or entity, even if it isn't the official name. The number of reliable sources using "DataGravity" appears to quite outnumber those using "DataGravity Inc." There are currently no other article on Wikipedia likely to be confused with this company name, and the only mention of 'Data Gravity' currently on Wikipedia refers to a concept by Dave McCrory of Basho Technologies. A simple Google search suggests the concept is more strongly tied to McCrory than to, say, Jim Gray. Should Dave McCrory merit an article that discusses his idea, and/or if Jim Gray's article is expanded to encompass his usage, then a disambiguation note might be warranted. Per WP:SMALLDETAILS, slight differences in spelling, capitalization or punctuation can also aid in distinguishing topics. thus, "data gravity" might be made into an article on the computing term, or a redirect to another article that discuses it, while the capitalized "Data Gravity" and spaceless "DataGravity" can be presumed to most appropriately refer to the company. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I understand. Thanks!--BelleBenny (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

neutrality

When I saw the initial tag on advertisement/neutrality concerns, I did some research. One thing I noticed was HyTrust mentions in their press release they "acquired the assets of DataGravity" (https://www.hytrust.com/hytrust-and-datagravity/). This seemed a contentious point in a few of the cited sources, which work to not call this an asset sale. I noticed BelleBenny undid that distinction in the recent edits, and rather than forcing any editor to pick a side, felt it best to honor the spirit of https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflicting_sources and cite both perspectives on the matter since they: come from reliable sources and contain direct quotes and correspondence from the parties involved. Arodwins (talk) 11:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I really didn´t think that this could be so important, I don´t understand it either ... I edited the “assets“ part because I thought that the important thing here was that the company was acquired by HyTrust, then if it was its assets or the company, was a secondary detail. Anyway, I have no problem with these editions.--BelleBenny (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]