Talk:Darcy Olsen
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
COI
[edit]One of the main editors, User:Mr. Conservative, is involved: his talk page claims him to be a PR person for the Goldwater Institute. I have urged the gentleman on his talk page to keep his edits neutral--if he doesn't, any editor is free to place a COI tag on top of the article. You may also peruse the archive of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard for a discussion, begun on 12 November 2011, on this very matter. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Darcy Olsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100607090207/http://www.jsa.org:80/jsa-today/people-power-politics-and-leadership-in-the-state-of-arizona.html to http://www.jsa.org/jsa-today/people-power-politics-and-leadership-in-the-state-of-arizona.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Was it really 16 years? They why does it SAY "15 years"?
[edit]The current status
[edit]Currently, (as of the current version of this article) the penultimate ("second-to-last") sentence in the "Goldwater_Institute" section of this article says:
Olsen left the Goldwater Institute in July 2017 after serving as its CEO for 15 years.[20]
What is going on?
[edit]The footnote -- (currently it is footnote number "[20]") -- at the end of that sentence points to a web page at the URL (or "internet address") https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/arizona/articles/2017-07-11/goldwater-institute-ceo-stepping-down-after-16-years now.
Both the body and the TITLE of that web page -- and the URL itself! -- show the time period as having been "16 years".
Also (note that) footnote number "[21]" (at the end of the next sentence) ... points to a web page [article] at: https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2017/07/10/goldwater-institute-leader-stepping-down-after-16-years/ -- which also mentions a time period of 16 years -- ! -- both in its URL and in the title (and the body!) of that article.
Proposed change
[edit]So, it would seem to me, that -- (unless there is some good reason to say "15 years" instead of "16 years") -- the sentence (the one quoted above) should be changed to say "16 years" instead. (right?)
If no one submits any good reasons (and, especially if no one submits any reasons at all) why this article should say "15 years" (as it does now) instead of "16 years", then ... it is my intention to edit that sentence (the one that is quoted above in a "block quote") to say "16 years" instead.
Any comments?
[edit]Any replies would be welcomed. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah it seems like "15 years" is just an error. Looks like it should be changed to 16 years per the sources. Marquardtika (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Primary Source
[edit]Hello! I have a notice on top of the article:Darcy Olsen that says this article relies excessively on primary sources. I only used the website as a source one time. What are the other primary sources? Thanks! Ajolley2023 (talk) 22:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)