Talk:Danny Lendich/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tim O'Doherty (talk · contribs) 17:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Bagging a spot now. Review will be forthcoming. Pinging voorts. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 17:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

I've now just seen voorts's talk page notice. I will pick up the review again after the 22nd, when he is available again. Best, Tim O'Doherty (talk) 17:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

@Tim O'Doherty: I'm back. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@Voorts - Alright. I'm a bit busy today; I'll finish the review tomorrow. Cheers, Tim O'Doherty (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@Voorts - Resuming review now. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): Prose is fine after brief copyedit. b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): Ref 5 has a maintenance tag, will need fixing before pass.Looks done now. b (citations to reliable sources): All of the sources look reliable enough. c (OR): Will do a spotcheck later. Verified refs. d (copyvio and plagiarism): Earwig gives 2.0%, no worries there. It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: Neutral. It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: Stable. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Licencing looks good, as do the captions.
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·