This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
In the lead of this article, Daniel Cluff is referred to as the officer-in-charge of Chatham Lifeboat Station. He may have been in charge of the station, however as an officer, he would have been called the commanding officer rather than the officer-in-charge. The term officer-in-charge as used by the U.S. Coast Guard is reserved for an enlisted Coast Guardsman that is in charge of a small station or cutter. It is not used in any other context by the Coast Guard. The instances where an enlisted person would be in charge of a unit are limited to very small units of men usually numbering less than 10 to 15 persons. An officer-in-charge has less authority to operate their unit or cutter than an officer would have under the same circumstances but, never the less, still the person that is responsible for the completion of the unit's mission. An example of limited authority would be the application of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. An officer-in-charge must refer all charges against personnel in his unit to the next higher authority in the chain of command, which would be an officer.
The term used in the lead should be changed to commanding officer. I was unable to check the cite used in the offending sentence because the reference is unavailable to me. If the writer of the newspaper article used as a reference used the term officer-in-charge in the newspaper article then it was an error in understanding Cluff's actual responsibilities. The name of the billet that Cluff filled was that of commanding officer; there was no officer-in-charge. Cuprum17 (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
