Talk:Daniel Sommer

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Initial article posted. Ahnog 17:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biased

There are very few footnotes, so while some of it might be factually correct, there is no way of checking up on the sources. Secondly, the second external link is written from a very anti-Sommer perspective, by a man who historically has an axe to grind with conservative Christians. He is not a reputable source.

− Thirdly, the introductory paragraph of this work is a guess, not a statement of facts. At the very least, that hypothesis should have a footnote where someone credible puts forth that idea. I would suggest Dayton Keesee's book "The Churches of Christ During the Civil War" as one who makes that claim and attempts to back it up. + Thirdly, the introductory paragraph of this work is an opinion, not a statement of facts. There appears to be a bias against Sommer by the original writer of this Wiki article.

Finally, there appears to be a bias against Sommer by the original writer of this Wiki article; toned down from what it could be, but biased nonetheless.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daniel Sommer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060526203902/http://holyliving.us/articles/REFLECTIONS.pdf to http://holyliving.us/articles/REFLECTIONS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]