Talk:Dangerous restart

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible copyvio

I tagged one section as a possible copyvio [1]. It occurs here [2]. Since the date on that source postdates it being added to our article, it probably didn't originate from there but it's also unlikely they were copying from us since they include one extra detail that was never in our article [3]. I'm seeing the same thing all over, e.g. here which appears to be a US federal government source [4]. The first sentence is mostly here [5] where it's mentioned that it's listed at NIOSH publication 99.110 but I don't know if that includes the same wording. Suffice it to say, it's unlikely it was written by the original contributor or if it was, they put it somewhere else. So clarification over the licence status is needed. Perhaps it's public domain in which case we could simply attribute it here (which we require by policy to avoid this confusion even if it isn't required by law). However the original contributor has been username blocked since not long after creating this article. I thought the same may apply to the other examples but actually even going back to the original wroding I can't find them anywhere. It's possible they were all taken from publications which aren't online. Nil Einne (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]