Talk:Dangal (2016 film)/GA1

GA Review

Unsuccessful. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 20:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting situation - a film nominated by an IP who apparently has never edited the page, though of course they may have done so under a different address. And it's been waiting a while. In any case, we'll need a reviewer to be able to respond to comments. Pinging some top contributors. Maestro2016, Editor5454, Cyphoidbomb, Rashkeqamar, Gouravbhosale, Sid95Q; are any of you willing and able to step in as the GA 'nominator' for this article? —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editor5454, Cyphoidbomb, Gouravbhosale, Sid95Q, M.Billoo2000, anyone up for it? —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Koresdcine, Materialscientist, any interest? I'll give it five days (until the 27th); at that point if no reviewer is available I'll close the nomination. —Ganesha811 (talk) 01:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Ganesha811: If there's doubt that the nominator has contributed to the page before, then I think it should be deemed an immediate fail to decrease the backlog even just a little. And I don't think you should be pestering other users to take over a GAR that you initiated (remember that every contribution made in Wikipedia is voluntary, meaning Wikipedians are basically their own bosses). There's a reason why none of the users you pinged responded to you within 24 hrs. Take a hint. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perfectly aware that Wikipedia is voluntary and of course no one is under any obligation to help with this review, which is why I plan to close it if no one responds, as I wrote. I simply figured that since these editors were major contributors to the article, they might want to know it has a chance to reach GA status, especially since it often takes months for a GA review to be picked up at all (such as in these case). I wanted to wait five days because not everyone edits every day, and I thought, having opened this review, I should give the article a fair chance to go through the proper process rather than being closed immediately and unceremoniously. —Ganesha811 (talk) 06:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.