Talk:Dane Cook
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dane Cook article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Dane Cook. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Dane Cook at the Reference desk. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joe Rogan and Dane Cook
[edit]Rogan had Dane Cook as a guest on his podcast (Number 33, 3rd August 2010), and he (Rogan) said (at the close of the podcast [2h26m]) that Cook was "...a good dude", and that he was "...glad we put all that shit past and hung out.....I think you doing some awesome shit". Cook replied; "That means the world hearing that from you Joe...you've got alot of integrity and i've always had alot of respect for you". They also revealed that they had been buddies since the 1990's.
Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2022
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the hyperlink to "Child Grooming" that has been added under the "Personal Life" section for the sentence "they had met a few years prior". 110.174.215.96 (talk) 10:31, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Already done Cannolis (talk) 12:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- So grooming. It should be re-added. 2600:1700:1612:2060:A133:9E26:8398:BFE0 (talk) 15:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Spouse
[edit]Why is it relevant that his wife is 26 years younger than him? Why is there a hyperlink? #loveislove — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.107.192.191 (talk) 12:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Stylized Photo
[edit]New to editing so not making this big of a decision but, is it right to have such a stylized photo for a person for their Wikipedia page? It just feels like a more standard one would be used Yk? Amperesand (talk) 06:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- C-Class vital articles in People
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Comedy articles
- High-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Massachusetts articles
- Low-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject United States articles