Talk:Dance Party USA

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Pls see revisions. I'm trying to comply, thanks, dancepartyusaDancepartyusa (talk) 04:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "DANCE PARTY USA" user's form of the page

Is quite frankly terrible. It's not written in encyclopediac tone, begins with a bunch of original research/weasel wording instead of a lead (actually I don't see anywhere where "what is this thing" is explained!), is a MOS/typographic disaster (all-caps words, mis-use of bold), has two "trivia" sections and two huge lists of non-notable-for-WP-article people and sponsors. And it includes a copyright notice, and it asserts all-rights-reserved! What?? By definition, WP content must be GFDL-compatible. I'm going to revert this PR piece back to the version that is an actual encyclopedia article instead of a website. If there is any information that is encyclopediac, feel free to write it as such and integrate it into the article. DMacks (talk) 02:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert to the stable version.--SilverOrion (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I remember this show..it was famous for having a roving camerman do upskirt shots of the girl dancers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.116.55 (talk) 23:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unsuitable content

“I’m pretty sure nobody remembers them but they were my friends so I thought I’d give them a shout out.”?!? 2003:EF:2747:9E00:C035:8DBD:7124:AA6 (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, nope. I removed it. DMacks (talk) 20:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]